
|
 |
Research
Enhanced Identification of
Postoperative Infections
Deborah S. Yokoe,*
Gary A. Noskin,† Susan M. Cunningham,† Gianna Zuccotti,‡ Theresa Plaskett,‡
Victoria J. Fraser,§ Margaret A. Olsen,§ Jerome I. Tokars,¶ Steven Solomon,¶
Trish M. Perl,# Sara E. Cosgrove,# Richard S. Tilson,* Maurice Greenbaum,**
David C. Hooper,†† Kenneth E. Sands,‡‡ John Tully,§§ Loreen A. Herwaldt,¶¶
Daniel J. Diekema,¶¶ Edward S. Wong,## Michael Climo,## and Richard Platt*,***
*Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; †Northwestern
University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; ‡Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,
New York, New York, USA; §Washington University School of Medicine, St.
Louis, Missouri, USA; ¶Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,
Georgia, USA; #Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland,
USA; **North Shore Medical Center-Salem Hospital, Salem, Massachusetts,
USA; ††Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; ‡‡Beth
Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; §§Mount Auburn
Medical Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; ¶¶University of Iowa Carver
College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA; ##McGuire Veterans Affairs
Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA; and ***Harvard Pilgrim Health
Care, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Appendix
| Appendix
Table 1. ICD-9-CM procedure and diagnosis codes to identify study
procedures and screen diagnosis codes |
|
|
ICD-9-CM codes
|
Description
|
|
|
Procedure codes
|
|
CABG
|
|
36.10–36.14
|
Aortocoronary bypass of coronary artery/arteries
|
|
36.15–36.17
|
Internal mammary-coronary artery bypass
|
|
36.19
|
Other bypass anastomosis for heart revascularization
|
|
36.2
|
Heart revascularization by arterial implant
|
|
Cesarean delivery
|
|
74.0–74.2, 74.4
|
Cesarean section (classical, low cervical, extraperitoneal,
of other specified type)
|
|
74.9, 74.91,
74.99
|
Cesarean section of unspecified type
|
|
Breast procedures
|
|
85.23
|
Subtotal mastectomy
|
|
85.31–85.32
|
Reduction mammoplasty
|
|
85.33–85.36
|
Subcutaneous mammectomy
|
|
5.4, 85.41–85.48
|
Mastectomy (unilateral or bilateral, simple or radical)
|
|
5.50
|
Augmentation mammoplasty
|
|
5.53
|
Unilateral breast implant
|
|
5.54
|
Bilateral breast implant
|
|
5.6
|
Mastopexy
|
|
5.7
|
Total reconstruction of breast
|
|
Diagnosis codes
|
Description
|
|
998.5, 998.51,
998.59
|
Postoperative infection
|
|
674.32, 674.34
|
Other complications of obstetrical surgical wounds
|
|
670.02, 670.04
|
Major puerperal infection
|
|
| aICD-9-CM, International
Classification of Diseases 9th Revision Clinical Modification; CABG,
coronary artery bypass graft procedures. |
| Appendix
Table 2. SSI ratesa after CABG proceduresb,c |
|
|
Hospital
|
SSI rates based on (%)
|
|
|
Routine surveillance
|
Any method (routine, antimicrobial
exposure, discharge diagnoses)
|
|
|
1A
|
2.2
|
2.6
|
|
1B
|
2.3
|
3.5
|
|
1C
|
5.9
|
7.4
|
|
1D
|
7.7
|
9.9
|
|
Phase 1 pooled (SSI/procedures)
|
4.9 (112/2,267)
|
6.3 (142/2,267)
|
|
2A
|
2.4
|
6.1
|
|
2B
|
2.5
|
6.6
|
|
2C
|
3.5
|
6.0
|
|
2D
|
5.3
|
8.2
|
|
2E
|
6.1
|
9.6
|
|
2F
|
6.5
|
8.8
|
|
Phase 2 pooled (SSI/procedures)
|
4.6 (298/6,472)
|
7.7 (501/6,472)
|
|
| aThe numbers of
SSI (surgical site infection) and procedures are not specified by
hospital to maintain confidentiality of the hospitals' identities. |
| bCABG, coronary
artery bypass graft. |
| cOn the basis of
routine surveillance and routine surveillance plus antimicrobial exposure
or diagnosis code screening. |
| Appendix
Table 3. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of routine
surveillance, and antimicrobial exposure screening using a 9-day antimicrobial
interval or diagnosis code screening for identifying SSI after CABG
proceduresa |
|
|
Hospital
|
Sensitivity
|
Positive predictive value
|
|
|
|
Routine surveillance
|
Antimicrobial exposure
|
Diagnosis codes
|
Antimicrobial exposure
or diagnosis codes
|
Antimicrobial exposure
|
Diagnosis codes
|
Antimicrobial exposure
or diagnosis codes
|
|
|
1A
|
85
|
75
|
45
|
75
|
33
|
75
|
14
|
|
1B
|
67
|
83
|
67
|
100
|
56
|
89
|
55
|
|
1C
|
80
|
82
|
57
|
84
|
47
|
86
|
47
|
|
1D
|
78
|
81
|
83
|
92
|
37
|
83
|
40
|
|
Pooled
|
0.79
|
0.80
|
0.61
|
0.87
|
0.33
|
0.86
|
0.35
|
|
2A
|
42
|
97
|
67
|
97
|
30
|
100
|
30
|
|
2B
|
41
|
100
|
78
|
100
|
35
|
78
|
33
|
|
2C
|
58
|
100
|
55
|
100
|
39
|
87
|
39
|
|
2D
|
65
|
92
|
57
|
95
|
33
|
89
|
33
|
|
2E
|
63
|
78
|
28
|
83
|
43
|
73
|
44
|
|
2F
|
74
|
100
|
53
|
100
|
39
|
77
|
39
|
|
Pooled
|
59
|
91
|
54
|
93
|
36
|
84
|
36
|
|
| aSSI, surgical
site infections; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft. |
| Appendix
Table 4. Percentage of patients who underwent CABG procedures
and who met the antimicrobial exposure or diagnosis code screening
criteriaa |
|
|
Hospital
|
% of CABG patients with
|
|
|
9-day antimicrobial threshold
|
7-day antimicrobial threshold
|
Diagnosis code criteria
|
9-day antimicrobial or
diagnosis code criteria (%)
|
|
|
1A
|
13.7
|
–b
|
2.2
|
13.8
|
|
1B
|
21.0
|
–b
|
7.4
|
22.2
|
|
1C
|
12.9
|
–b
|
4.9
|
13.2
|
|
1D
|
5.2
|
–b
|
3.5
|
6.4
|
|
Pooled
|
15.2
|
–b
|
4.5
|
15.8
|
|
2A
|
18.6
|
18.9
|
3.7
|
18.6
|
|
2B
|
17.3
|
21.0
|
6.2
|
18.2
|
|
2C
|
15.0
|
17.0
|
3.9
|
15.0
|
|
2D
|
22.9
|
31.5
|
5.3
|
23.6
|
|
2E
|
17.4
|
18.2
|
3.7
|
17.9
|
|
2F
|
22.6
|
25.3
|
6.0
|
22.6
|
|
Pooled
|
19.1
|
23.1
|
4.6
|
19.6
|
|
| aCABG, coronary
artery bypass graft. |
| b7-day antimicrobial
threshold was not evaluated. |
| Appendix
Table 5. SSI ratesa after cesarean deliveryb,c |
|
|
Hospital
|
SSI rates (%)
|
|
|
Routine surveillance
|
Any method (routine, antimicrobial
exposure, diagnosis codes)
|
|
|
1A
|
2.2
|
3.8
|
|
1B
|
1.5
|
5.0
|
|
1C
|
0.9
|
2.7
|
|
1D
|
0.8
|
1.7
|
|
1E
|
5.3
|
6.4
|
|
Phase 1 pooled (SSI/procedures)
|
1.6 (43/2,659)
|
4.1 (110/2,659)
|
|
2A
|
0.3
|
3.7
|
|
2B
|
1.9
|
4.3
|
|
2C
|
NA
|
5.9
|
|
2D
|
NA
|
8.2
|
|
Phase 2 pooled (SSI/procedures)
|
1.6 (49/3,065)
|
5.5 (263/4,740)
|
|
| aThe numbers of
SSI and procedures by hospital are not specified to maintain confidentiality
of the hospitals' identities. |
| bSSI, surgical
site infection; NA, routine SSI surveillance for this procedure type
was not performed at this hospital. |
| cOn the basis of
routine surveillance versus routine surveillance plus screening by
antimicrobial exposure or diagnosis code criteria. |
| Appendix
Table 6. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of routine
surveillance and antimicrobial exposure screeninga |
|
|
Hospital
|
Sensitivity (%)
|
Positive predictive value (%)
|
|
|
|
Routine surveillance
|
Antimicrobial exposure
|
Diagnosis codes
|
Antimicrobial exposure
or diagnosis code
|
Antimicrobial exposure
|
Diagnosis codes
|
Antimicrobial exposure
or diagnosis code
|
|
|
1A
|
58
|
83
|
50
|
92
|
40
|
50
|
38
|
|
1B
|
30
|
94
|
48
|
98
|
52
|
73
|
52
|
|
1C
|
32
|
86
|
54
|
95
|
27
|
43
|
27
|
|
1D
|
50
|
100
|
0
|
100
|
20
|
0
|
20
|
|
1E
|
82
|
82
|
45
|
91
|
56
|
83
|
59
|
|
Phase 1 pooled
|
39
|
90
|
48
|
96
|
42
|
61
|
42
|
|
2A
|
9
|
87
|
100
|
100
|
45
|
49
|
39
|
|
2B
|
44
|
73
|
75
|
100
|
48
|
100
|
56
|
|
2C
|
NA
|
98
|
80
|
100
|
21
|
40
|
20
|
|
2D
|
NA
|
89
|
72
|
92
|
46
|
81
|
44
|
|
Phase 2 pooled
|
38
|
84
|
78
|
97
|
37
|
67
|
38
|
|
| aSSI, surgical
site infections; NA, routine SSI surveillance for this procedure type
was not performed at this hospital. |
| bUsing a 2-day
antimicrobial interval or diagnosis code screening for identifying
SSI after cesarean delivery. |
| Appendix
Table 7. Percentage of patients who underwent cesarean delivery
and who met the antimicrobial exposure or diagnosis code screening
criteria |
|
|
Hospital
|
% of cesarean deliveries with
|
|
|
2-day antimicrobial
exposure criterion
|
Diagnosis code criteria
|
2-day antimicrobial exposure
or diagnosis code criteria
|
|
|
1A
|
7.9
|
3.8
|
9.2
|
|
1B
|
9.1
|
3.3
|
9.4
|
|
1C
|
8.8
|
3.5
|
9.7
|
|
1D
|
8.5
|
0
|
8.5
|
|
1E
|
9.4
|
3.5
|
9.9
|
|
Pooled
|
8.8
|
3.2
|
9.5
|
|
2A
|
7.0
|
7.5
|
9.4
|
|
2B
|
6.5
|
3.3
|
7.7
|
|
2C
|
27.4
|
11.8
|
28.6
|
|
2D
|
20.0
|
9.2
|
21.2
|
|
Pooled
|
12.7
|
6.4
|
14.1
|
|
| Appendix
Table 8. SSI ratesa after breast proceduresb,c |
|
|
Hospital
|
SSI rates (%)
|
|
|
Routine surveillance
|
Any method (routine, antimicrobial,
discharge diagnoses)
|
|
|
1A
|
0
|
0
|
|
1B
|
1.0
|
1.2
|
|
1C
|
1.2
|
2.1
|
|
1D
|
0
|
0
|
|
1E
|
0
|
0
|
|
1F
|
1.3
|
1.3
|
|
1G
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 1 pooled (SSI/procedures)
|
0.7 (10/1,477)
|
0.9 (14/1,477)
|
|
2A
|
0.3
|
1.6
|
|
2B
|
0.4
|
0.9
|
|
2C
|
NA
|
3.6
|
|
2D
|
NA
|
3.3
|
|
2E
|
NA
|
1.8
|
|
Phase 2 pooled (SSI/procedures)
|
0.4 (7/1,765)
|
2.3 (110/4,698)
|
|
| aThe numbers of
SSI and procedures by hospital are not specified to maintain confidentiality
of the hospitals' identities. |
| bSSI, surgical
site infection; NA, routine SSI surveillance for this procedure type
was not performed at this hospital. |
| cOn the basis of
routine surveillance versus routine surveillance plus screening by
antimicrobial exposure or diagnosis code criteria. |
| Appendix
Table 9. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of routine
surveillance and antimicrobial exposure screeninga,b |
|
|
Hospital
|
Sensitivity (%)
|
Positive predictive value (%)
|
|
|
|
Routine surveillance
|
Antimicrobial exposure
|
Diagnosis codes
|
Antimicrobial exposure
and/or diagnosis codes
|
Antimicrobial exposure
|
Diagnosis codes
|
Antimicrobial exposure
and/or diagnosis codes
|
|
|
1A
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
1B
|
83
|
50
|
50
|
50
|
60
|
100
|
60
|
|
1C
|
57
|
86
|
43
|
100
|
40
|
75
|
44
|
|
1D
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
0
|
–
|
0
|
|
1E
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
0
|
–
|
0
|
|
1F
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
33
|
100
|
33
|
|
1G
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
0
|
–
|
0
|
|
Pooled
|
71
|
71
|
50
|
79
|
19
|
58
|
20
|
|
2A
|
0
|
100
|
50
|
100
|
20
|
75
|
20
|
|
2B
|
50
|
100
|
42
|
100
|
33
|
45
|
33
|
|
2C
|
NA
|
92
|
75
|
92
|
38
|
56
|
34
|
|
2D
|
NA
|
95
|
82
|
100
|
37
|
96
|
38
|
|
2E
|
NA
|
80
|
40
|
100
|
29
|
62
|
27
|
|
Pooled
|
33
|
94
|
70
|
96
|
33
|
79
|
33
|
|
| aSSI, surgical
site infection; NA, not applicable, –, no SSI identified at this hospital;
NA, routine SSI surveillance for this procedure type was not performed
at this hospital. |
| bUsing a 6-day
antimicrobial interval or diagnosis code screening for identifying
SSI after breast procedures. |
| Appendix
Table 10. Percentage of patients who underwent breast surgery
and who met the antimicrobial or diagnosis code screening criteria |
|
|
Hospital
|
% of breast surgery with
|
|
|
6-day antimicrobial
exposure criterion
|
Diagnosis code criteria
|
6-day antimicrobial exposure
or diagnosis code criteria
|
|
|
1A
|
6.2
|
1.4
|
6.5
|
|
1B
|
1.0
|
0.6
|
1.0
|
|
1C
|
4.4
|
1.2
|
4.7
|
|
1D
|
1.5
|
0
|
1.5
|
|
1E
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
1F
|
3.8
|
1.3
|
3.8
|
|
1G
|
10.2
|
0
|
10.2
|
|
Pooled
|
3.5
|
0.8
|
3.7
|
|
2A
|
7.9
|
1.0
|
7.9
|
|
2B
|
2.6
|
0.8
|
2.6
|
|
2C
|
8.8
|
4.9
|
9.7
|
|
2D
|
8.5
|
2.8
|
8.7
|
|
2E
|
6.3
|
1.7
|
6.5
|
|
Pooled
|
6.7
|
2.0
|
6.8
|
|
|