Error processing SSI file
Mass Media Campaigns are Effective in Preventing Alcohol-Impaired Driving
A CDC–led systematic review of the research literature revealed that, under certain conditions, mass media campaigns are effective in preventing alcohol–impaired driving. Based on these findings, the Task Force on Community Preventive Services–a 15–member, nonfederal group with expertise in public health policy, behavioral and social sciences–issued a recommendation for mass media campaigns that are carefully planned, well executed, attain adequate audience exposure, and are implemented in conjunction with other ongoing alcohol–impaired driving prevention activities.
Estimating Campaign Effects
Mass media campaigns to prevent alcohol–impaired driving are typically carried out in conjunction with other programs and policies that have the same goals. Thus, isolating the effects of mass media campaigns can be difficult. To address this problem, researchers only reviewed studies that either (1) evaluated campaigns over periods during which other activities to prevent alcohol–impaired driving did not change substantially, or (2) used statistical models to account for the possible effects of concurrent prevention activities.
Evidence of Effectiveness
Findings from the systematic review are based on eight studies (reported in six papers)1–6 that evaluated the effectiveness of mass media campaigns on fatal crashes, fatal and nonfatal injury crashes combined, crashes that damage property, and drivers' blood alcohol levels. (Two additional studies were excluded from the review based on study quality criteria.7,8) The campaigns reviewed had several components in common: pretesting of messages; high levels of audience exposure, generally achieved through paid advertising; and corresponding prevention efforts at the local level (e.g., high–visibility enforcement of impaired driving laws).Of the campaigns evaluated, three focused on increasing public awareness of local law enforcement activities and the legal consequences of drinking and driving.1–3 The remaining five studies (reported in three papers) evaluated campaigns that emphasized the social and health consequences of alcohol–impaired driving.4–6 Overall, the evaluated studies showed median decreases of 13% (interquartile range, 6% to 14% decrease) for total alcohol–related crashes and 10% (interquartile range, 6% to 15% decrease) for injury crashes. No clear differences were noted in the effectiveness of campaign messages that emphasized legal consequences versus social and health consequences, though certain messages and delivery channels may be more effective with particular audiences.
Cost–benefit analyses were available for two of the reviewed campaigns.4,9 The estimated societal benefits exceeded the costs of developing and airing the campaign messages by factors of 8 and 21, respectively.
Get email updates
To receive email updates about this page, enter your email address:
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC)
4770 Buford Hwy, NE
Atlanta, GA 30341-3717
TTY: (888) 232-6348
- Contact CDC–INFO