Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: email@example.com. Type 508 Accommodation in the subject line of e-mail.
Recommendations for the Investigation of Contacts of Persons with
Infectious Tuberculosis (TB)
Decision to Initiate a Contact Investigation
The features of the TB case under investigation inform decisions about whether to perform a contact investigation
(see Figure 1). An investigation (i.e., seeking and evaluating contacts) is recommended for the following forms of suspected
or confirmed TB because they are likely to be infectious: pulmonary, laryngeal, or pleural TB disease with 1)
pulmonary cavities, 2) respiratory specimens that have acid-fast bacilli (AFB) on microscopy, or 3) both.
As time and resources permit and as recommended investigations are completed successfully, other pulmonary TB cases
may be investigated if they are confirmed by culture of respiratory secretions.
Pulmonary TB cases without positive mycobacteriology results should not be investigated unless circumstances
indicate otherwise (e.g., if mycobacteriologic results are absent because of an error or if a priori information raises suspicion
that contacts have been infected).
The only forms of purely extrapulmonary TB (i.e., cases without pulmonary disease) that should be investigated
are laryngeal or pleural disease. For other forms, source-case investigations can be considered under special circumstances
(see Source-Case Investigations).
Investigating the Index Patient and Sites of Transmission
Written policies and procedures for these tasks improve uniformity and efficiency.
Tasks should be assigned to trained and experienced public health workers.
Interviews should be in the index patient's primary language and be conducted by persons fluent in that language or
in conjunction with fluent interpreters.
The index patient should be interviewed in person (i.e., not by telephone)
<1 business day after notification for
cases indicating infectiousness and <3 business days for others. For patients who have died or who are inaccessible,
alternative sources of information regarding contacts should be sought.
The place of residence for the index patient should be visited
<3 business days of initiating the contact investigation.
All potential settings for transmission should be visited
<5 working days of initiating the contact investigation.
The contact list and priority assignments (see Assigning Priorities to Contacts) should be written into an investigative plan.
Information regarding the index patient should be reassessed at least weekly until drug-susceptibility results are available
for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolate, for 2 months after notification, or until infectiousness has
diminished, whichever is longer.
At 1--2 weeks after the first interview, the index patient should be interviewed again as necessary for clarification
and additional information.
Assigning Priorities to Contacts
Priorities for ranking contacts for investigation are set on the basis of the characteristics of the index patient, the
duration and circumstances of exposure, and the vulnerability or susceptibility of the contact to disease progression from
M. tuberculosis infection.
The optimal exposure cut-off durations for assigning priorities to contacts have not been determined because available
data lack this level of precision. The National Tuberculosis Controllers Association work group did not reach consensus on
cut-off durations. On the basis of local experience and adjusting for resource limitations, public health officials should
set local standards for the durations of exposure that define high,
medium, and low priority.
Diagnostic and Public Health Evaluation of Contacts
Health departments are responsible for ensuring that TB contacts are medically evaluated and treated.
Communicable disease regulations or laws in certain
jurisdictions apply to contacts who are not responsive to requests to
be examined. The least restrictive means should be applied first.
Each high- and medium-priority contact should be
assessed initially <3 working days after being listed.
Each high- and medium-priority contact should be evaluated medically to determine whether TB disease
and latent infection with M. tuberculosis are present or absent.
The same diagnostic methods are recommended for all contacts except when they have medical or constitutional
conditions making TB more likely or more difficult to diagnose. A contact's country of origin and Bacille Calmette-Guérin
(BCG) vaccination status are not included in algorithms for diagnosis or treatment.
Voluntary HIV Counseling, Testing, and Referral
Inform all contacts that HIV infection is the greatest known risk factor for TB disease progressing
from M. tuberculosis infection, and ask whether they have been tested for HIV infection.
Offer voluntary HIV counseling, testing, and referral to TB contacts who do not know their HIV infection
status. Collaboration with HIV-AIDS programs is recommended for establishing systems that are convenient and flexible
Voluntary HIV counseling, testing, and referral are recommended for contacts of HIV-infected infectious TB patients.
Tuberculin Skin Testing
A tuberculin skin test (TST) is recommended for all contacts who do not have a documented prior positive test result
or documented prior TB disease. The skin test can be administered at the time of the initial assessment.
High-priority contacts should receive a test
<7 days after they are listed, and medium-priority contacts
A two-step TST as defined for infection control surveillance is not recommended for contact
Evaluation of Children Aged <5 Years
Contacts aged <5 years exposed to an infectious index patient are assigned a high priority.
Contacts aged <5 years should be medically examined and have a chest radiograph regardless of the result of the current
or prior skin tests or history of prior TB disease.
Evaluation of HIV-infected or Other Immunocompromised Contacts
HIV-infected or other immunocompromised contacts are high-priority contacts.
In addition to a medical history, examination, and a
TST, a chest radiograph is recommended for all these contacts.
Sputum collection for AFB microscopy and culture is recommended if the contact has symptoms consistent with TB disease or
if the chest radiograph has abnormalities that could be caused by TB.
Any Contacts Being Evaluated
Contacts who have a positive TST result
(>5 mm) should be medically examined, including a chest radiograph, to rule
out TB disease. Contacts who have symptoms consistent with TB also should be medically evaluated, including a
chest radiograph, to rule out TB, regardless of the results of the skin test, history of a prior positive result, or history of prior
During the infectious period, those high- and medium-priority contacts who have a negative skin test result <8 weeks
after their most recent exposure should have a second skin test 8--10 weeks after that exposure.
For low-priority contacts, the initial skin test may be
delayed until 8--10 weeks after the most recent exposure if the
contact does not have symptoms suggestive of TB disease. If the test is administered <8 weeks after the most recent exposure,
the decision to give a second, postexposure skin test can be made on a case-by-case basis.
Treatment for Contacts with
M. tuberculosis Infection
Treating contacts who have latent M.
tuberculosis infection through completion is a health department responsibility
to prevent communicable diseases.
High- and medium-priority contacts with positive TSTs who come from countries with prevalent TB should be
treated, regardless of whether they have had routine BCG vaccination.
Treatment for latent infection should be offered to all contacts who have a positive tuberculin skin test result, after active
TB is excluded. The emphasis of the program should be on completing treatment in high- and medium-priority contacts.
Window-period prophylaxis (see Diagnostic and Public Health Evaluation of Contacts) is recommended as an option
for contacts aged <5 years who have a negative skin test result <8 weeks after the end of exposure, after TB disease has
been excluded. If a second skin test result 8--10 weeks after the end of exposure is negative, treatment can be stopped.
A full course of treatment for presumptive M.
tuberculosis infection is recommended for HIV-infected or otherwise
notably immune-suppressed contacts, after TB disease has been excluded, even if skin test results are negative >8 weeks after
the end of exposure.
The decision to treat contacts who have documentation of a previous positive skin test result or TB disease should be
made on an individual basis. Treatment is recommended for HIV-infected contacts in this category, even if infection has
been treated previously.
Rifampin treatment is recommended for contacts who, after TB disease has been excluded, have infection presumed to
be isoniazid (INH)-resistant, rifampin-susceptible
M. tuberculosis after exposure to an index patient with such an isolate.
Expert consultation is recommended for selecting treatment for a latent infection with presumed INH- and
rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis. Contacts with such an infection should be monitored with periodic examination for at least
Directly observed therapy (DOT) for latent infection is preferred over self supervised. DOT preference should be
assigned to these groups, in this general order:
--- confirmed or suspected TB disease;
--- latent M. tuberculosis infection in contacts aged
--- latent M. tuberculosis infection in contacts who have HIV infection or other conditions that limit immune response
--- latent M. tuberculosis infection in contacts with documented change in tuberculin sensitivity, from a negative to
a positive result; and
--- latent M. tuberculosis infection in contacts who might not complete treatment because of social or
behavioral impediments (e.g., alcohol addiction, chronic mental illness, injection-drug use, unstable housing, unemployment).
Monitoring for adherence and adverse effects by home visits, pill counts, or clinic appointments monthly or more often
is recommended for contacts on self-administered treatment.
Use of enablers and incentives and establishment of a positive rapport with contacts who are taking treatment
are recommended for enhancing adherence.
When to Expand a Contact Investigation
Inclusion of lower-priority contacts generally is not recommended unless objectives for high- and medium-priority
contacts are being met.
Consider expanding the scope (i.e., number of contacts) of an investigation if any one or more of the following criteria exist:
--- unexpectedly large rate of infection or TB disease in high-priority contacts,
--- evidence of second-generation transmission,
--- TB disease in any contacts who had been assigned low priority,
--- infection in any contacts aged <5 years, and
--- contacts with change in skin test status from negative to positive.
After reviewing the results from the investigation to date (i.e., for high- and medium-priority contacts), select the
additional contacts by extrapolating the risks for infection as shown by the data.
When results from an investigation indicate that it should be expanded, but resources are insufficient, seeking
assistance from the next higher public-health administrative level is recommended.
Communicating Through the Media
Anticipatory media communication (e.g., with a press release) for large or highly visible TB contact investigations
is recommended to capitalize on the opportunity for constructive public communications.
Coordination of media communications, both within the health department and with collaborating partners outside
the health department, improves the clarity and consistency of media messages.
For efficiency, use of media message templates for contact investigations is recommended.
Data Management and Evaluation of Contact Investigations
Collection of specific data elements on index patients and their contacts is recommended. The data elements should
permit calculation of program performance indices.
Data should be collected on standardized (paper or electronic) forms.
Data definitions and formats for use by persons who collect, use, and interpret contact investigation data are recommended.
Whenever feasible, data definitions and formats should be standard among jurisdictions.
Electronic data storage is recommended for quick analysis of interim results.
Policies for data management and storage are recommended, with assignment of responsibilities.
Training and policies for data accuracy, completeness, and security are recommended. Part of a staff-person's time should
be dedicated to reviewing and monitoring contact investigation data.
Periodic summarization and review of data are recommended during a particular contact investigation and overall.
Program evaluation for contact investigation activities, at least annually, is recommended. It is an integral part of
TB program responsibility.
Beyond standard data elements shown in these guidelines, specific additional elements can contribute to local
Confidentiality and Consent in Contact Investigations
Specific policies for release of confidential information related to contact investigations are recommended. These
policies should be consistent with the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA) and Sections 306 and 308(d) of the Public Health Service Act and be developed in consultation from health
department legal counsel. These policies typically include instructions for obtaining consents and for breaking confidentiality
when required for public health as authorized by laws.
Patient confidentiality is a core element integrated with all activities in contact investigations, and training in its laws
and practice is recommended for all personnel who participate.
Discussion with the index patient and contacts
regarding their confidentiality beliefs and concerns is recommended. TB
control program staff should explain to the index patient the measures that will be taken to maintain confidentiality.
Preparations for protecting confidentiality are recommended for each site visit during an investigation.
Anticipatory discussions with any patients who might be affected contribute to the preparations.
Confidentiality applies to all private information and medical conditions in addition to TB.
Staffing and Training for Contact Investigations
Certain functions in contact investigations require state licensure. Delineation of these functions is recommended
for preparing personnel position descriptions.
Specialized functions and related skills are needed during contact investigations; they might be provided by sources
outside of the health department (Box 3).
Preparatory training and detailed on-the-job supervision as each function is encountered by new health
department personnel establish the basis for expertise.
Direct observation by experienced personnel and opportunities for practicing skills are essential when any personnel
assume new functions for contact investigations.
Clerical personnel, receptionists, and managers who help with contact investigations need to understand the overall
purpose and methods of contact investigations.
When sources outside the health department serve essential functions in a contact investigation, the health
department is responsible for assessing whether the skills are sufficient and offering training so that the functions are met correctly.
Contact Investigations in Special Circumstances
A cluster of TB cases (i.e., a presumed outbreak) indicates potential lapses in TB control which should be
investigated along with the outbreak. Assistance should be requested if the scope of the investigation exceeds local capacity or disrupts
key activities of TB control.
When secondary TB cases are discovered unexpectedly (e.g., outside of a contact investigation), this indicates a
potential outbreak. Review of the investigative strategy is recommended.
When contact investigations include congregate settings, officials or administrators at the setting should be enlisted
as collaborators. Access to employee and occupancy rosters should be sought. Sensitivities and needs of the setting and
its populace should be accommodated to the extent permitted by good public health practice.
When few contacts are listed because information cannot be obtained from an index TB patient, alternative or
proxy methods, such as interviews in the extended social network, are recommended.
Contact investigations for multidrug-resistant TB do not require a change in procedures, but the reasons for the
drug resistance should be explored.
Interjurisdictional contact investigations should be planned collaboratively from the inception. Assistance in
coordinating such investigation should be sought from the next higher public-health administrative level.
Unusual exposures to M. tuberculosis-complex, such as laboratory accidents or tuberculous animals, should be
investigated on site, and contacts should be selected in accordance with the event, in consultation with subject-matter experts.
Source-case investigations are not recommended unless investigations of infectious cases have been successfully
completed and program objectives for investigating contagious patients and treating their infected contacts are being met.
Source-case investigations, if conducted, are recommended for TB disease in children aged <5 years.
Data on source-case investigations should be reviewed for determining the value of these investigations in the local context.
Searching for a source of unexplained latent
M. tuberculosis infection is not recommended, and if conducted, should be
reserved for infected children aged <2 years.
Systems for providing culturally and linguistically acceptable care during contact investigations are recommended.
Training in cultural and linguistic sensitivity is recommended for personnel who conduct contact investigations.
Social Network Analysis
The methods of social network analysis are recommended for further research. However, certain concepts (e.g.,
setting-based investigations) are also applicable to current efforts.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are
provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply
endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content
of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of
the date of publication.
All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text
into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version.
Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or
the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables.
An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents,
U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800.
Contact GPO for current prices.
**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to