spacer

CDC HomeHIV/AIDS > Topics > Prevention Programs > Replicating Effective Programs Plus > Questions and Answers

space Replicating Effective Programs Plus
space
arrow REP Packages
 
arrow Community PROMISE
arrow Connect
arrow ¡Cuídate!
arrow d-UP
arrow FIO NEW 2009
arrow HR
arrow Insights NEW 2011
arrow "light"
arrow Mpowerment
arrow Nia
arrow PfH
arrow PCC NEW 2010
arrow POL
arrow Project AIM
arrow Project START
arrow RAPP
arrow RESPECT
arrow SEPA NEW 2009
arrow SHIELD
arrow Sister to Sister
arrow Street Smart
arrow TLC
arrow VOICES/VOCES
arrow Packages by Topic
space
arrow Related Resources
space
arrow Ordering Information
space
arrow Questions and Answers
space
arrow Contact Us
space
LEGEND:
PDF Icon   Link to a PDF document
Non-CDC Web Link   Link to non-governmental site and does not necessarily represent the views of the CDC
Adobe Acrobat (TM) Reader needs to be installed on your computer in order to read documents in PDF format. Download the Reader. 
spacer spacer
spacer
Skip Nav spacer
Questions and Answers: REP Process
spacer
spacer

Replicating Effective Programs

What criteria must interventions meet to be considered for the REP collection?

For REP, an intervention cannot already be packaged or widely used and must have either best- or promising-evidence of efficacy. The standards for best-and promising-evidence of efficacy can be found on the Prevention Research Synthesis project website.

Back to Questions

What are the procedures for adding intervention packages to the REP collection?

Each year or two CDC announces a request for applications to translate the science-based protocols of proven interventions. Researchers with effective interventions apply for competitive funding to translate their research protocols into intervention packages for use by prevention providers. The highest scoring applicants are selected. Various letters of support may need to accompany applications. For example, if the research was part of a multisite project with a common protocol, applicants need letters from all of the original developers of the intervention indicating their commitment to participate in developing the intervention materials and specifying the nature of their participation. Of particular importance is narrative that discusses generalizing the intervention to other target populations. If the applicant is not the intervention's original researcher, the applicant also needs letters of permission from the intervention's originator(s) to develop and market materials for the proposed intervention package.

CDC staff then work with the funded researchers to develop technical assistance guides, training materials, posters, and any other materials necessary to implement the intervention, all of which become part of the intervention package. Once the intervention packages have been developed, CDC posts fact sheets on the REP+ Web site and alerts REP+ listserv subscribers to the availability of the added packages.

Back to Questions

What products are prepared with a REP-packaged intervention?

By the end of their REP cooperative agreement, the researchers will have developed all of the materials that a prevention provider would need to conduct the intervention. Two of the main products are a (1) starter kit, which includes information on intervention logistics, intervention costs, and an intervention protocol checklist for program administrators, and (2) an intervention package, which includes an implementation manual, promotional material, and nonconsumable items needed to implement the intervention. The researchers also will have developed materials to support the adoption and delivery of their intervention by prevention providers, such as a curriculum for training of facilitators, which includes a training quality assurance plan, and a technical assistance guide.

To view pictures of a package’s contents, click the corresponding link below:

If CDC’s Diffusion of Effective Behavioral Interventions (DEBI) project disseminates a REP-packaged intervention, DEBI may add enhancements to the packages, such as logic models and evaluation guides. The DEBI project is a national-level strategy to provide high-quality training and ongoing technical assistance for selected evidence-based HIV/STD prevention interventions, including those packaged by REP, to state and community HIV/STD program staff.

Back to Questions

What is the process for packaging an intervention for the REP collection?

Interventions are packaged under a 2-year cooperative agreement. A cooperative agreement differs from a grant in that CDC staff are substantially involved in the program activities, above and beyond routine grant monitoring. For example, CDC staff review and approve the packages’ contents. See www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/grants/faq_foa_general.shtm for more details on cooperative agreements.  In the first year of the cooperative agreement, researchers (1) form an advisory committee of HIV prevention providers, community members, and members of the target population; (2) translate the science-based protocol into everyday language; (3) develop package contents and format with advisory committee; (4) recruit at least two HIV prevention agencies as case study agencies that will field test the package during the second year; (5) develop and pilot test a training curricula for agency staff; and (6) develop a process evaluation plan.

In the second year of the cooperative agreement, researchers (1) orient the case study agencies to the intervention; (2) collaboratively tailor and adapt the intervention; (3) train agency staff how to deliver the intervention and teach them the technical skills needed for intervention delivery; (4) provide technical assistance on implementation and problem-solving; (5) evaluate the process of implementation and debrief the agency staff; (6) develop technical assistance guidance manuals on the basis of the researcher’s and agencies’ experience; (7) refine the intervention package and training curricula based on agency input; and (8) produce refined versions of all materials for dissemination.

The REP project is considered to be a nonresearch activity by CDC and, therefore, does not require institutional review board (IRB) review. However, the investigators’ research/academic institutions can decide to make an independent determination.

If CDC’s Diffusion of Effective Behavioral Interventions (DEBI) project disseminates a REP-packaged intervention, DEBI will update the package when medical information, such as guidance on condom efficacy, changes and may further refine the materials based on the experiences of implementing agencies.

Back to Questions

What materials make up an intervention package?

A REP intervention package consists of an implementation manual, promotional or marketing material, handouts, posters, brochures, and any other nonconsumable items needed to implement the intervention.

The implementation manual has several sections, beginning with a brief description of the intervention and the science behind it. A section on getting started steps covers the intervention’s core elements related to preparation, time line of necessary preparation steps, list of collaborators, material resources, facilities, staff, recruitment of participants, quality assurance plan, and cost categories for conducting the intervention. A section on implementation steps covers the intervention’s core elements related to implementation, protocols and examples for implementing the intervention and ensuring quality and consistency, identification of barriers to implementation, and advice on how these barriers may be overcome. A section on steps to keep the intervention going covers the intervention’s core elements related to maintenance and deals with issues of staff turnover and retraining. Last, an evaluation assistance section contains an intervention logic model, evaluation plan, process and outcome monitoring methods, and sample instruments.

In addition, REP packages usually have a starter kit, which contains information on intervention logistics, intervention costs, and an intervention protocol checklist for program administrators.

Back to Questions

What are an intervention’s core elements?

At the request of case study agencies, core elements were developed. Core elements are a tool to help researchers and agencies make interventions fit agencies’ settings, circumstances, and populations while maintaining fidelity to what the research has determined to be effective. Core elements serve as parameters for the parts of an intervention that should not be changed, benchmarks for intervention fidelity, and references for quality assurance of intervention implementation. Researchers articulated what defines their intervention—those fundamental components that, if changed, would transform their intervention into something other than what they had deemed to be effective.

Core elements are critical features of an intervention’s intent and design. They are thought to be responsible for an intervention’s effectiveness and put an intervention’s underlying theoretical constructs into operation. Core elements can be identified by using one or all of the following three methods: (1) practical application of the intervention’s underlying theory, (2) experience using the intervention, and (3) if available, a component analysis of procedures.

The number of core elements in an intervention can vary from as few as three to as many as nine. However, the median number of core elements for the current REP packages is five. The nature of core elements in interventions can vary by concepts or underlying principles, the specific set and/or sequence of methods, the intended outcomes, the specific set of components and their venues, the number and type of persons delivering the intervention, and restrictions to certain settings or populations.

Back to Questions

Do all prevention programs using a REP package need to adhere to CDC’s HIV Content Guidelines?

The HIV Content Guidelines ensure that HIV prevention materials contain messages on ways by which individuals can protect themselves from acquiring the virus or reduce their risk of acquiring or spreading the virus. The Guidelines provide a framework for developing and using educational materials and require that Program Review Panels (PRPs) consider the appropriateness of messages designed for various groups. According to the Guidelines, the PRPs must be composed of at least 5 members, include at least one employee of the state or local health department, and represent a reasonable cross-section of the general population.

Investigators receiving CDC funds for HIV intervention research are required to identify a local PRP in their jurisdiction to review and approve any materials used with the study participants. Agencies implementing a CDC-funded program should have their local PRP review and approve all materials that will be viewed by or given to persons receiving the intervention.

To view the Guidelines, go to

Back to Questions

Do you have an intervention for my population?

REP packages behavioral and social interventions for HIV prevention. REP does not package policy or structural interventions, such as needle exchange programs. You may search for REP-packaged HIV prevention interventions with demonstrated evidence of effectiveness by visiting our REP Packages by Topic page. If after searching the Web site, you are unable to find an intervention that suits your needs, please contact us at dhaprep@cdc.gov.

Back to Questions

Do you plan to package non-US interventions?

At this time, REP does not have plans to package non-US interventions.

Back to Questions

Last Modified: March 6, 2009
Last Reviewed: March 6, 2009
Content Source:
Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
horizontal dividing line
Contact Us
Please click here to view contact information.
divider
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer CDC Black Logospacer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348, 8A-8P (EST) M-F. Closed weekends and major federal holidays - cdcinfo@cdc.gov
spacer
spacerHHS Logo