 |
|
2002 Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report: Section 2—ART
Cycles Using Fresh, Nondonor Eggs or Embryos |
|
Explanation of Figures, Section 2: ART Cycles Using
Fresh, Nondonor Eggs or Embryos
This
page contains figures 15–32 of Section 2C
Click on titles or images to go back to Section 2C
Figure
25
Figure 25 is a
pie chart representing types of ART procedures using fresh nondonor eggs
or embryos, 2002. (Note: Cycles that were cancelled before egg retrieval
were classified as IVF, GIFT or ZIFT based on the intended ART method.)
- IVF without ICSI (intracytoplasmic
sperm injection), 46.3%
- IVF with ICSI, 52.8%
- GIFT, 0.2%
- ZIFT, 0.5%
- Combination of IVF
with or without ICSI and either GIFT or ZIFT, 0.1%
Figure
26
Figure 26 is a
bar graph representing live births per retrieval for different types of
ART procedures, using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos, 2002.
- IVF without ICSI (intracytoplasmic
sperm injection), 34.0%
- IVF with ICSI, 31.9%
- GIFT 25.4%
- ZIFT 26.3%
- Combination of IVF
with or without ICSI and either GIFT or ZIFT, 22.9%
Figure
27
Figure 27 is a
pie chart representing use of ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) in
fresh–nondonor cycles among couples with and without diagnoses of male
factor infertility, 2002. (Note: This is based on 45,334 cycles that used
ICSI).
- ICSI use among
couples diagnosed with male factor infertility, 55.9%
- ICSI use among
couples without a diagnosis of male factor infertility, 44.1%
Figure
28
Figure 28 is a
bar graph representing percentage of live births per retrieval for ART
cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos among couples diagnosed with
male factor infertility who used IVF with ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm
injection) in comparison to IVF without ICSI, by woman’s age, 2002. (Note:
Cycles using donor sperm and cycles using GIFT or ZIFT are excluded. The
comparison group of IVF without ICSI includes couples with all diagnoses
except male factor infertility.)
- Age <35 Live births
per retrieval, IVF without ICSI 42.6%, IVF with ICSI 41.3%
- Age 35–37 Live births
per retrieval, IVF without ICSI 37.0%, IVF with ICSI 35.2%
- Age 38–40 Live births
per retrieval, IVF without ICSI 26.5%, IVF with ICSI 24.4%
- Age 41–42 Live births
per retrieval, IVF without ICSI 15.3%, IVF with ICSI 11.7%
- Age >42 Live births
per retrieval, IVF without ICSI 7.0%, IVF with ICSI 4.3%
Figure
29
Figure 29 is a
bar graph representing the percentage of live births per retrieval for ART
cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos among couples not diagnosed
with male factor infertility, by use of ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm
injection) and woman’s age, 2002. (Note: Cycles using GIFT and ZIFT are
excluded.)
- Age <35 Live births
per retrieval, IVF without ICSI 42.6%, IVF with ICSI 37.5%
- Age 35–37 Live births
per retrieval, IVF without ICSI 37.0%, IVF with ICSI 32.0%
- Age 38–40 Live births
per retrieval, IVF without ICSI 26.5%, IVF with ICSI 23.0%
- Age 41–42 Live births
per retrieval, IVF without ICSI 15.3%, IVF with ICSI 12.2%
- Age >42 Live births
per retrieval, IVF without ICSI 7.0%, IVF with ICSI 4.5%
Figure
30
Figure 30 is a
bar graph representing a comparison of live births per transfer between
cycles that used gestational carriers and those that did not (both using
fresh nondonor embryos), by ART patient’s age, 2002.
(Note: Age categories reflect the age of the ART patient, not the age of
the gestational carrier.)
- Age <35 Live births
per transfer, did not use gestational carrier, 42.9%
- Age <35 Live births
per transfer, used gestational carrier, 55.3%
- Age 35–37 Live births
per transfer, did not use gestational carrier, 37.0%
- Age 35–37 Live births
per transfer, used gestational carrier, 47.3%
- Age 38–40 Live births
per transfer, did not use gestational carrier, 26.4%
- Age 38–40 Live births
per transfer, used gestational carrier, 28.1%
- Age >40 Live births
per transfer, did not use gestational carrier, 12.1%
- Age >40 Live births
per transfer, used gestational carrier, 26.3%
Note: We were unable to
further subdivide ages >40 because the number of such cycles is very
small.
Figure
31
Figure 31 is a bar graph
representing live births per transfer for ART cycles using fresh nondonor
eggs or embryos, by day of embryo transfer, 2002. (Note: Cycles using GIFT
and ZIFT are excluded. This comparison is limited to transfers on day 3
and day 5. Embryo transfers performed on days 1, 2, 4, and 6 are not
included because each of these accounted for a small proportion of
procedures).
- Age <35 Live births per
transfer, day three 41.9%, day five 49.7%
- Age 35–37 Live births per
transfer, day three 36.8%, day five 42.7%
- Age 38–40
Live births per transfer, day three 25.7%, day five 35.1%
- Age 41–42 Live births per
transfer, day three 14.5%, day five 20.9%
- Age >42 Live births per
transfer, day three 6.2%, day five 14.3%
Figure 32
Figure 32 is a bar graph representing live
birth rates for ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos, by clinic
size, 2002. (Note: clinic size is determined by number of cycles performed
in 2002).
- Clinic size <61 Live births per cycle 27.4%
- Clinic size 61–118 Live births per cycle 28.3%
- Clinic size 119–251 Live births per cycle 29.7%
- Clinic size >251 Live births per cycle 28.0%
Section
1 | Section 2 |
Section
3 | Section 4 |
Section
5
Previous ART Reports
Implementation
of the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992
Assisted
Reproductive Technology: Embryo Laboratory
Date last reviewed:
03/23/2006
Content source: Division
of Reproductive Health,
National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion
|
|
|
